Built for SaaS teams where GRC matters but does not yet justify a full-time hire

If compliance has quietly become your founder's, CTO's, engineering leader's, security lead's, or operations lead's second job, GetComply was built for that situation.

Best fit

GetComply is designed for companies like these

Cloud-hosted B2B SaaS

Usually around 15 to 75 employees, with a modern cloud, identity, and development environment.

Selling to security-conscious buyers

Enterprise prospects, procurement teams, and larger customers are asking for evidence, questionnaires, or SOC 2.

Building or maintaining a SOC 2 program

The company is preparing for a first examination or struggling to keep an existing program current.

No dedicated internal GRC lead

The work is currently distributed across people who already have full-time responsibilities.

Recurring assurance demand

Vendor reviews, access reviews, customer questionnaires, security calls, and policy work continue throughout the year.

Leadership can still make decisions

A founder, executive, or accountable sponsor is available to approve scope, policy, exceptions, and business-risk decisions.

Why companies reach out

Usually, something made the work urgent

An enterprise prospect asks for a SOC 2 report or a realistic path to one

A security questionnaire is slowing procurement or renewal

A first examination is now on the calendar

The company bought a platform, but progress still depends on an overloaded internal owner

Evidence is scattered across screenshots, documents, tickets, email, and memory

Access reviews, vendor reviews, policies, or questionnaires keep slipping between audit cycles

A founder or CTO is doing compliance work after hours

A customer, board member, insurer, or partner asks for a clearer security and governance story

The internal-owner problem

The work usually lands on someone who already has another job

In smaller SaaS companies, compliance rarely begins as a full-time role. It lands on a founder, CTO, engineering leader, security practitioner, or operations lead because that person has the most context and cannot ignore the customer request.

That arrangement can work briefly. It becomes difficult when the company has to keep collecting evidence, answering questionnaires, reviewing vendors, maintaining policies, tracking risk, and preparing for the next audit while still shipping the product.

GetComply removes the operational weight without pretending that leadership can outsource its decisions or accountability.

Strong fit

GetComply is a strong fit if you want

One named advisor who understands the program and its history
Weekly direction instead of a giant task list
Evidence reviewed before it is organized for the CPA firm
A clear path from customer pressure to examination preparation
Continued operation after the first report
A model that respects engineering time and actual architecture
The ability to keep an existing compliance platform rather than replace it
Clear boundaries around what GetComply runs and what your company decides

Not the right fit

GetComply may not be the right fit if

You want someone to guarantee an audit outcome
No leadership sponsor is available to approve scope, policy, exceptions, or risk decisions
You need broad legal representation or privacy counsel rather than GRC operating support
You require a federal-first, CMMC-first, highly complex PCI, or highly specialized regulatory program from day one
You operate a large on-premises or data-center-heavy environment that requires capabilities outside GetComply's current focus
You expect GetComply to make unauthorized technical changes or accept risk on your behalf
You only want the cheapest possible policy templates or a one-time checkbox exercise

See whether your team fits the model

Book a 30-minute intro call. We will discuss the trigger, current ownership, and whether the operating workload fits GetComply's service model.